 Activity vs. Accuracy. |
 |
  |
 Aug 20 2012, 02:24 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Junior Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,491 Joined: 28-December 11 Member No.: 13,419  |
Is Khan vs Mayweather on deck or something? lol
|
 |
 
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 11:25 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,689 Joined: 21-April 07 From: New York, New York Member No.: 5,991 |
If accuracy was the litmus test no way in hell calzaghe would have beat Hopkins.. I JUST got done watching Cal miss about 7 girl flurries followed by sharp right hand counters from Hopkins that were plain as day.... LMAO... activity should not mean shit if you aint landing..
This post has been edited by neophyte7: Aug 23 2012, 11:26 AM |
|
|
|
|
Aug 23 2012, 08:01 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,646 Joined: 21-July 11 Member No.: 12,858 |
QUOTE (neophyte7 @ Aug 23 2012, 11:25 AM)  If accuracy was the litmus test no way in hell calzaghe would have beat Hopkins.. I JUST got done watching Cal miss about 7 girl flurries followed by sharp right hand counters from Hopkins that were plain as day.... LMAO... activity should not mean shit if you aint landing.. I don't think Calzaghe beat B hop. The first 6 rounds were Bernard's easy and you include the knockdown, that gives him a 10-8 rd in the 1st. I gave the last 6 to Calzaghe though. And that comes to a score of 115-113 for Hopkins. But that's old news lol. I've never heard anyone say Calzaghe is an accurate puncher, I'd laugh my head off. The only way he won his fights were off those 6th grade flurries he threw. But you give me a fighter who is well schooled in boxing and knows the advantages of accuracy vs activity, I'll take that accurate fighter all day This post has been edited by mrchitown: Aug 23 2012, 08:02 PM |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 08:24 PM |