 Looks Like Peterson-Khan II is OFF! (SHIT!), Updates Begin on Page 3 (Reason? Peterson Failed Drug Test) |
 |
  |
 May 7 2012, 09:31 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
"The Meanest Nice Guy" Group: Moderators Posts: 9,541 Joined: 11-May 11 From: Wherever Greatness is Bred Member No.: 12,050  |
Holy futhermucker...
http://www.fighthype.com/news/article12368.html I dont know what to make of this ship (shit)... It looks as if Peterson has failed a drug test...guess we have to wait and see what actually happened... |
 |
 
|
|
May 7 2012, 09:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,936 Joined: 21-July 03 Member No.: 195 |
Thats a shame, I hope the drug wasnt PED's, and was something like weed or something. With PED's you can expect a suspension and I was really looking forward to this fight.
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 10:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
"The Meanest Nice Guy" Group: Moderators Posts: 9,541 Joined: 11-May 11 From: Wherever Greatness is Bred Member No.: 12,050 |
SMH...
http://www.boxingscene.com/source-peterson...osterone--52642 Hoping that this shit is just a publicity stunt, but something tells me that it's not... |
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 10:25 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Lightweight Group: Members Posts: 812 Joined: 26-April 11 Member No.: 11,903 |
so what now?
the fight canceled? |
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 11:38 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,975 Joined: 18-August 11 From: California Grown Member No.: 13,079 |
I wouldn't get too worried yet, could be a diaretic weed or something. But who knows honestly but we won't be sure until they say officially what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 07:16 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,138 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
Supposedly its anabolic steroids, the statement I saw didn't even seem like they weren't trying to say they were innocent, but the gist of it is that Peterson respects the VADA the ones who are doing the testing, just seems fishy why would a fighter request it and then fail it there's no way he could of thought he'd get away with something like that
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 07:47 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Super Featherweight Group: Members Posts: 665 Joined: 21-June 11 From: Macon, Ga Member No.: 12,604 |
Peterson seems like a straight shooter, so I hope it's not true. This will give khan an excuse for losing the first fight.
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 09:12 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Junior Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,491 Joined: 28-December 11 Member No.: 13,419 |
Any chance this further popularizes the frequency of drug testing? Even though I want to see this fight, it could be a blessing in disguise.
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 09:32 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
"The Meanest Nice Guy" Group: Moderators Posts: 9,541 Joined: 11-May 11 From: Wherever Greatness is Bred Member No.: 12,050 |
QUOTE (mgrover @ May 8 2012, 08:16 AM)  just seems fishy why would a fighter request it and then fail it there's no way he could of thought he'd get away with something like that The funny thing is, his TEAM requested it, and Peterson sort of kept quiet about it. He basically stated that he "didn't mind" random testing, but he was never the posterboy for it. QUOTE (BigFightFan @ May 8 2012, 08:47 AM) This will give khan an excuse for losing the first fight. My ass is already hurting behind the fact that Khan will piss & moan (as usual), and actually have somewhat of a valid reason to do so. It's his "I told you so" attitude (following the pissing & moaning) that makes you wanna snuff him. QUOTE (Franchize @ May 8 2012, 10:12 AM) Any chance this further popularizes the frequency of drug testing? Even though I want to see this fight, it could be a blessing in disguise. I actually agree, but fuck it, I want to see this fight. Lol. The fact that this news surfaced (whether it's true or not), is enough for commissions to start taking action. |
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 11:12 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Super Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 3,201 Joined: 28-January 11 From: Mars Member No.: 11,505 |
What a bombshell!
If it was Peterson, all I can do is shake my head and ask "why my brother, why?" If it turns out that it wasn't a diuretic, then the very bright silver lining is that random drug testing works and I hope that we'll start seeing more of it. Boxing has no place for steroid users! I'm not saying ban the guilty party for life, but if proven conclusively that it was a steroid and not a diuretic or the chron chron, then yes, there should definitely be a ban. The only thng about diuretics is that they can be used to mask the 'roids (as far as I'm aware), so finding a diuretic is not a good look at all. If it's just the buds then let's get ready to rumble on the 19th! This post has been edited by Cheesey1: May 8 2012, 11:15 AM |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 04:55 PM |