![]() ![]() |
Aug 23 2009, 08:23 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,860 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Chicago Member No.: 2,078 |
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 08:40 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Chief Haterizer Group: Team BU Posts: 10,592 Joined: 30-May 04 From: Sydney Member No.: 91 |
Hagler was fed up with the system that screwed him over. This fight was the beginning of the end for boxing in a lot of ways. From glove choice & ring size to # of rounds. This paved the way for the DLH’s, Mayweathers & Pac’s to believe they have the right to dictate these things as the challenger.
Hagler knew that merit, dominance & being a real champion meant absolutely nothing compared to being a media darling that gets press. Hard work & determination have been replaced by revenue generation & marketing. Hagler refused to play the BS so he left & went to Europe a land where they appreciate a great fighter over a celebrity. |
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 09:07 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
SKULLSPLITTER Group: Members Posts: 8,111 Joined: 15-March 06 Member No.: 4,665 |
Hagler was fed up with the system that screwed him over. This fight was the beginning of the end for boxing in a lot of ways. From glove choice & ring size to # of rounds. This paved the way for the DLH’s, Mayweathers & Pac’s to believe they have the right to dictate these things as the challenger. Hagler knew that merit, dominance & being a real champion meant absolutely nothing compared to being a media darling that gets press. Hard work & determination have been replaced by revenue generation & marketing. Hagler refused to play the BS so he left & went to Europe a land where they appreciate a great fighter over a celebrity. Great post. You can directly blame Ray Leonard for "The Money over The Glory" mindset of the big names that followed him.... |
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 09:36 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Super Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 3,181 Joined: 9-December 04 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1,309 |
Hagler was fed up with the system that screwed him over. This fight was the beginning of the end for boxing in a lot of ways. From glove choice & ring size to # of rounds. This paved the way for the DLH’s, Mayweathers & Pac’s to believe they have the right to dictate these things as the challenger. Hagler knew that merit, dominance & being a real champion meant absolutely nothing compared to being a media darling that gets press. Hard work & determination have been replaced by revenue generation & marketing. Hagler refused to play the BS so he left & went to Europe a land where they appreciate a great fighter over a celebrity. You got it nailed with that one. And damn... No one got brutally killed. Hagler did make a few Italian movies like Indio. Indio was a Rambo-like film. Hagler played the Troutman-like character. It was a terrible film. I remember renting it from Blockbuster back in the 90's. the selling point was that Hagler was the star, when he only had maybe 5minutes of screen time. I think he was the star of the sequel though... |
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 10:13 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Chief Haterizer Group: Team BU Posts: 10,592 Joined: 30-May 04 From: Sydney Member No.: 91 |
I just call it how I see it. I may come off as all bitter & twisted with delusional rants about fighters but deep down when you read between the lines most people are aware that i have a certain amount of knowledge on boxing. It is just some people cannot read between the lines on here.
One guy that gets nowhere near enough respect is Larry Holmes. In time people came to appreciate his greatness in the ring but not many realise he was the first big time fighter to do revolutionary things such as promoting his own fights on TV & calling a sanctioning bodies bluff by dumping their belt in the trash for the right reason as opposed to get out of a legit fight. Without Holmes doing that guys like DLH would never have been able to establish GBP although it appears that GBP is every bit as bad as DKP & Top Rank in jobbing fighters & shady tactics. Fighters like him, Hagler & Hopkins are a thorn in the sides of sanctioning bodies & promoters because they are independantly minded & voice their opinions without regard for the potential backlash. |
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 10:32 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,860 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Chicago Member No.: 2,078 |
|
|
|
Aug 23 2009, 11:07 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Cruiserweight Group: Team BU Posts: 5,543 Joined: 10-December 04 Member No.: 1,333 |
I think Hagler also refused to a 2nd fight because he knew he had fought as well as he could have at his diminished state and he probably was not going to do much better. I say "much better" because he could have started to let his hands go earlier in the fight but then again, Leonard would probably have done the same and then we would have ended up with the same close fight and you know that in a close fight SRL would get the win.
|
|
|
Aug 24 2009, 07:11 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Super Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 3,686 Joined: 9-December 04 Member No.: 1,307 |
|
|
|
Aug 24 2009, 07:33 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Chief Haterizer Group: Team BU Posts: 10,592 Joined: 30-May 04 From: Sydney Member No.: 91 |
His legacy would have been so so so different without the Tyson fight. His legacy was signed sealed & delivered well before the Tyson fight. The Tyson fight had as much to do with his legacy as McBride did with Tyson's. Had he won it would have added to his legacy & catapaulted him straight to #1 heavyweight of all time. How it is so so so different by a old rusty 39 year old losing to a peak Tyson confuses me. The only fights he has ever lost were world title fights, never knocked out or stopped. I would love to know what else he could have done to do mor efor his legacy I really would Sal. Think about it did SRL losing to Camacho affect his legacy as a great fighter? Did Duran losing William fucking Joppy affect his legacy? Of course not because when they were at their peak they did more than enough to secure their legacy as ATG fighters. |
|
|
Aug 24 2009, 09:31 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
0 Group: Team BU Posts: 0 Joined: 8-December 04 Member No.: 1,253 |
QUOTE I think Hagler also refused to a 2nd fight because he knew he had fought as well as he could have at his diminished state and he probably was not going to do much better. That's likely NOT the case. The second time around, Hagler could have spent LESS time switching stances and trying to "out box" the boxer. Those were rounds, wasted, IMO. I thought Hagler deserved the nod first time around. Hags was fed up and rolled. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 08:04 AM |