![]() ![]() |
Dec 7 2012, 06:55 PM
Post
#81
|
|
|
Light Heavyweight Group: Members Posts: 4,091 Joined: 20-May 11 From: killa kali Member No.: 12,336 |
manny 147...jmm 143
(IMG:http://fightnews.com/Boxing/cozzone_pacmanmarquezweighinA.jpg) pac has to flex...while marquez looks ripped in a relaxed stance. |
|
|
Dec 7 2012, 08:39 PM
Post
#82
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,109 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
supposedly pac hasnt really been doing much strength and conditioning for this fight, just focusing on the boxing. Pacs lost a step maybe whether it be age, him growning into a full fledged welterweight or all of the above, but i doubt he gets stopped, i doubt one can stop the other, ill admit i misplaced my faith in pac thinking he'd ko marquez in the third fight, but no matter how many times i go back and watch those fights i cant see either knocking the other out, everytime they stun each other they both come back fighting. Pac says hes going for the ko which is a good thing since if hes very aggressive he could outland marquez in rounds and take a decision, but i cant see it, hes not the sake cagey animal as hefore, hes grown bored and fat of boxing, and is so predictable, comes in, left right combo, straight back out.
|
|
|
Dec 7 2012, 08:40 PM
Post
#83
|
|
|
Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 386 Joined: 19-October 11 From: Brooklyn, New York Member No.: 13,329 |
How is it Marquez looks bigger but comes in lighter than Pacquiao? Can someone save me the trouble of google and explain how weight works that way?
|
|
|
Dec 8 2012, 01:45 AM
Post
#84
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,956 Joined: 18-August 11 From: California Grown Member No.: 13,079 |
How is it Marquez looks bigger but comes in lighter than Pacquiao? Can someone save me the trouble of google and explain how weight works that way? Less body fat maybe took a dump before the fight or drained as much water weight he could which would explain why hes so ripped. But he looks extremely strong tho, this might get interesting if age has not caught up to him. I feel a knockdown happening this fight Oh and manny looked a little thick around the waist This post has been edited by checkleft: Dec 8 2012, 02:25 AM |
|
|
Dec 8 2012, 03:13 AM
Post
#85
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,109 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
Ripped isnt always heavier in body building terms, not sure how itd translate in boxing
|
|
|
Dec 8 2012, 05:19 AM
Post
#86
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,956 Joined: 18-August 11 From: California Grown Member No.: 13,079 |
Ripped isnt always heavier in body building terms, not sure how itd translate in boxing The way I have always defined ripped is as if someone was big enough to rip a shirt. But marquez also seems shredded to which where I come from means he has a lot of muscle definition, so that would explain the lower weight since he shows little body fat. But also pac has been at this weight much longer then marquez so even with marquez recent visual body gains he still hasn't had the time to physically build himself up to welterweight. |
|
|
Dec 8 2012, 08:44 AM
Post
#87
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Moderators Posts: 456 Joined: 30-September 11 Member No.: 13,282 |
Marquez is absolutely on that bullshit.
The only difference is, nowadays, there are so many "precursor" type of performance enhancing drugs that we'll never know for sure. It's almost like, you have to be really, really stupid to get caught. But yeah, a 39 year old guy who suddenly gets ripped ? Ha ha ha ha ha. |
|
|
Dec 8 2012, 11:22 AM
Post
#88
|
|
|
Strawweight Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 25-August 11 From: Pasay City, Philippines Member No.: 13,128 |
Obviously Marquez looking more likely to win this one. Every indicationpoints to such a feeling. Why do a FOURTH fight only to have Manny win again? Obviously this 4th fight is made to right the wrongs of the past 3 fights -- whcih is Marquez not winning any of them.
I'm rooting for Marquez to win this fight too. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th May 2013 - 10:35 AM |