 Pernell Whitaker vs. Shane Mosley (147), Classic |
 |
  |
 Aug 19 2007, 06:00 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Super Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 3,082 Joined: 10-December 04 From: Cali Member No.: 1,319  |
Mosley has the speed to trouble anyone at lightweight but Whitaker would be just a little too elusive.
Sweet Pea by UD. |
 |
 
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 05:51 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Super Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 3,181 Joined: 9-December 04 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1,309 |
This is a tough one. Both in their primes, I'd take Mosely. Mosely would land the harder punches. We know Pea would peck you to death and make you miss badly. Mosley wouldnt miss badly... Mosley SD12.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 11 2007, 10:53 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Amateur Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 7-July 07 Member No.: 6,172 |
QUOTE(Maxy @ Feb 1 2007, 11:48 AM) [snapback]312578[/snapback] At their peaks I would pick Whitaker to win. Mosley was a very good boxer. Whitaker is a great one. Whitaker was "great" at 135 and 140, but not at 147. Mosely would be too fast and strong for Whitaker at that point in Whitaker's career |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th May 2013 - 12:13 PM |