Replies

[Douchebag]

So this is how the game goes.

1. Someone will change the outcome or the events of a certain fight or a situation in a fighters life.

2. Someone else will post the result of that change and then put up there own scenario with the same fighter or another fighter.



I'll start.




What if Marvin Haggler would have got the not against Leonard?

[STEVENSKI]

It would have made no difference whatsoever to the beating Joe dished out. Unless you think Mathis & Ellis resemble Frazier in any way shape or form.

What if Ali vs Frazier had a competant referee who did not allow Ali to initiate 200+ clinches in their second fight?

[SmartyBeardo]

It would have made no difference whatsoever to the beating Joe dished out. Unless you think Mathis & Ellis resemble Frazier in any way shape or form.

What if Ali vs Frazier had a competant referee who did not allow Ali to initiate 200+ clinches in their second fight?

First of all, if Ali would have fought Ellis and Mathis first, Frazier would have probably made the mistake of facing Foreman and that would have been the end of it. If not, Ali would have had four fights and considerably more rounds under his belt before getting in the ring with Frazier. It would have made the difference in a decision.

Using the prevalent thinking by you and most on this thread, a different referee wouldn't have changed a motherfuckin' thing.

This post has been edited by SmartyBeardo: May 24 2010, 09:04 PM

[D-MARV]

First of all, if Ali would have fought Ellis and Mathis first, Frazier would have probably made the mistake of facing Foreman and that would have been the end of it. If not, Ali would have had four fights and considerably more rounds under his belt before getting in the ring with Frazier. It would have made the difference in a decision.

Using the prevalent thinking by you and most on this thread, a different referee wouldn't have changed a motherfuckin' thing.

Don't argue with him... he HATES Ali. His opinion on Ali means jack shit.