[ks1]

PalookaJoe,

A lot of people who are in contempt were not really charged with contempt. The law is very lenient as regards these matters. That's why I'm telling these Floydiots how rigid they are in the use of language.

Floyd was in contempt as told by Caneman. Well, could it be that Caneman is using the term loosely? I think so.

You don't know anything about the law Pactard. You looked up a few terms and, as is typical in the internet age, are pretending to be knowledgeable when it's painfully obvious you don't truly understand what you've been going on about. You've so boxed yourself into a corner, that you've totally ignored what the judge you supposedly quoted (rather selectively so) was actually ruling on. Namely, Pac's request for default judgement which was denied. That was the main issue. The Floyd fine, as I've said, was a minor side event to that ruling.

Now you're trying to bs around the fact that Floyd was not charged with contempt because it undermines your ranting about civil contempt. Also, you STILL don't know the difference between court ordered and appear in court and keep incorrectly saying that Floyd was ordered to appear in court and didn't when in fact he was ordered to make himself available to give depo testimony which would have taken place in one of the lawyers offices.

Thank God you're not a lawyer or a law student and are just playing on the internet because if you were one, you'd be a terrible one. Can you imagine any competent attorney crowing about winning a fine approximately equal to a day's pay after losing a request for a default judgement that possibly could have garnered millions!!? Even a gigantic windbag like Petrocelli (Pac's lead attorney) wouldn't go that far but I guess that's what chat room "experts" are for. LMAO!

This post has been edited by ks1: Oct 22 2011, 07:56 PM

[The Ollie Reed F...]

You

Because Floyd listens to his father. Right. They have that kind of relationship and understanding. Keep fishing. A mental hold on Floyd? So Manny is Ms. Cleo now? I hope this fight happens just so this rubbish can stop. If Manny's bank roll is low, he will.

You again now starting to change your tune after i called you on it

Maybe or maybe not. The last time I heard they don't even speak and from what Jr. says he can careless if they talk or see each other again. Who knows what goes behind closed doors: Maybe Jr. and Sr. only agree to all things boxing which is why he still trains his son. Who shall see

Me

Not fucken maybe, maybe not, definitely.

Apart from their blowup in the last camp it is well known that Senior has played an active part in strategy for the last few years since their reconciliation. To say Floyd doesn't listen to his father in boxing matters is ludicrous.

You now completely doing a 360.

Which is why Floyd is the first to always gives his dad credit.

Are you so fuvken stupid you actually forget what you posted like 2 pages earlier?

First it's Floyd doesn't listen to his father, then it's he always gives his dad credit. I'd say stick to tennis Joi but you clearly don't know fuck all about that either

This post has been edited by The Ollie Reed Fan Club: Oct 22 2011, 05:44 PM

[Big Slim Sweet]

I'd say stick to tennis Joi but you clearly don't know fuck all about that either

Pete Samprass begs to differ.

[The Ollie Reed F...]

Pete Samprass begs to differ.

(IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)

[Allmenjoi8]

You


You again now starting to change your tune after i called you on it

Me

You now completely doing a 360.

Are you so fuvken stupid you actually forget what you posted like 2 pages earlier?

First it's Floyd doesn't listen to his father, then it's he always gives his dad credit. I'd say stick to tennis Joi but you clearly don't know fuck all about that either

my last quote was sarcasm

[Hops]

Now you're trying to bs around the fact that Floyd was not charged with contempt because it undermines your ranting about civil contempt. Also, you STILL don't know the difference between court ordered and appear in court and keep incorrectly saying that Floyd was ordered to appear in court and didn't when in fact he was ordered to make himself available to give depo testimony which would have taken place in one of the lawyers offices.

Thank God you're not a lawyer or a law student and are just playing on the internet because if you were one, you'd be a terrible one. Can you imagine any competent attorney crowing about winning a fine approximately equal to a day's pay after losing a request for a default judgement that possibly could have garnered millions!!? Even a gigantic windbag like Petrocelli (Pac's lead attorney) wouldn't go that far but I guess that's what chat room "experts" are for. LMAO!

Lol!!! He was ordered to make himself available. So he was not ordered to appear in court? Your rigidity is like that of the hole in a needle. Okay, so if he was ordered to make himself available but he did not, that's defiance. That's contempt.

Your stupidity is out of this world, too. Why would anybody charge Floyd with contempt when the sanction for first time offense would be... well the sanction that judge Larry Hicks already handed out to him.

Now, if you dimwit still think that Floyd is not doing anything wrong by defying the order, then he can use that Floydiotic principle in case he does it again the 2nd time around.

Floyd: "Hey Judge, why are you handing out a severe sanction?"
Judge: "Because you did not appear in court."
Floyd: "What did I do wrong? I did nothing wrong. I did not violate anything. Remember that I did nothing wrong when I defied your order the first time."

See your Floydiotic logic?

The law cannot penalize someone for doing something which is not wrong. If it's not wrong the first time, then it's not wrong the 2nd time. It's just plain simple to think that people in authority just let people go in the first offense in lots of situations. It's standard for first contempt to go unpunished.

Now, if congress ordered you... or in your words... invited you to appear because you have information about something extremely vital this nation. Then fuck, you better appear.

[PalookaJoe]

Lol!!! He was ordered to make himself available. So he was not ordered to appear in court? Your rigidity is like that of the hole in a needle. Okay, so if he was ordered to make himself available but he did not, that's defiance. That's contempt.

Your stupidity is out of this world, too. Why would anybody charge Floyd with contempt when the sanction for first time offense would be... well the sanction that judge Larry Hicks already handed out to him.

Now, if you dimwit still think that Floyd is not doing anything wrong by defying the order, then he can use that Floydiotic principle in case he does it again the 2nd time around.

Floyd: "Hey Judge, why are you handing out a severe sanction?"
Judge: "Because you did not appear in court."
Floyd: "What did I do wrong? I did nothing wrong. I did not violate anything. Remember that I did nothing wrong when I defied your order the first time."

See your Floydiotic logic?

The law cannot penalize someone for doing something which is not wrong. If it's not wrong the first time, then it's not wrong the 2nd time. It's just plain simple to think that people in authority just let people go in the first offense in lots of situations. It's standard for first contempt to go unpunished.

Now, if congress ordered you... or in your words... invited you to appear because you have information about something extremely vital this nation. Then fuck, you better appear.

I think ks' point is that Floyd was not ordered to appear in COURT, he was ordered to appear for a deposition, which would be at a lawyer's office. He was never ordered to show up for court and refused. He just refused to show up for the depo.

He WAS ordered to show up for that though, so I would think that would be a defiance of the Judge's order whether it was in court or not though.

[Hops]

Sorry, Palooka. Messed up with the use of IN instead of BY. However, it was really a court order. I would have to polish my skills in rigid use of language.

II. Discussion

Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in pertinent part that the court, in
its discretion, may issue sanctions against a party for that party’s failure to attend a deposition. See FED. R. CIV. P. 37((IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) (1) and ((IMG:style_emoticons/default/cool.gif) (2)(A). Here, it is undisputed that Mayweather, Jr. failed to attend his deposition even after he was ordered to appear by the court. Thus, the issue before the court is whether and what kind of sanctions are appropriate under this circumstance.

[PalookaJoe]

Sorry, Palooka. Messed up with the use of IN instead of BY. However, it was really a court order. I would have to polish my skills in rigid use of language.

Oh my mistake.

As a wise man once said...

[HazConvictedFelo...]

(Transcript translated for non-hood rats, and gay stuttering/sarcoidosis related wheezing removed)

LMAO, what a bitch.

I said Shane, can you make 142, 143? Then we have no fight. You're not Oscar. Meaning: the guy is worth sticking our chin out into harm's path. We'll see you on the back end. We'll see you after you've become easy enough to beat. When Shane Mosley knocked Margarito's head into the 3rd row in the staples center, Manny Pacquiao and his trainer decided not to risk it. His trainer even said that they could make twice as much money fighting Cotto. A fighter who has a paper title and was forced to defend it at a catchweight. It's a business and Manny wants to get paid for what he does. I don't have to be a hater in order to lose respect for a fighter and his status because he refused to take a fight that I would've (and many other boxing fans) loved to see. I wanted clarity in the division. I wanted the best (so-called) fighter in the world to face off with the #1 welterweight in the world. That fight would've put Manny as the lineal champ if he would've won. Instead, FMJ still holds that claim. He needs to man up. Floyd certainly manned up against the fighter who many thought had what it took to knock Floyd out. He did that twice over.