 Changes in Ring Magazine's Championship Rating Policy |
 |
  |
 May 5 2012, 09:29 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
The Consultant Group: Root Admin Posts: 8,840 Joined: 2-December 02 Member No.: 14  |
Was this drafted when Delahoya's company bought on the magazine?
http://3morerounds.com/featured/inside-the...es-meaningless/ Jack |
 |
 
|
|
May 6 2012, 06:50 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,115 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
adding more bullshit to the mix that is boxing.
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2012, 12:42 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 419 Joined: 5-March 05 From: LA, CA by way of Panama Member No.: 1,846 |
not good news.
|
|
|
|
|
May 6 2012, 12:48 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Lightweight Group: Members Posts: 747 Joined: 10-November 06 Member No.: 5,559 |
I'm not gonna argue that this is good or bad. I'm just gonna state that even With this change the RING is Still better than any of the sanctioning bodies that we have today.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 03:36 AM |