![]() ![]() |
Jun 18 2012, 12:47 PM
Post
#31
|
|
|
Light Heavyweight Group: Members Posts: 4,139 Joined: 20-May 11 From: killa kali Member No.: 12,336 |
Yeah I did, in HD. Looked more like Pacquiao won. why did they edit lampley's commentary? in round 2, i believe....pac was holding on to bradley's arm...and bradley proceeded to whack pac with the free hand and lampley says something about bradley holding and hitting...i noticed that was absent from the replay. |
|
|
Jun 18 2012, 06:07 PM
Post
#32
|
|
|
"The Meanest Nice Guy" Group: Moderators Posts: 9,522 Joined: 11-May 11 From: Wherever Greatness is Bred Member No.: 12,050 |
why did they edit lampley's commentary? in round 2, i believe....pac was holding on to bradley's arm...and bradley proceeded to whack pac with the free hand and lampley says something about bradley holding and hitting...i noticed that was absent from the replay. Tell me about it! I dont how in the hell Bradley was "clamping" Pacquiao's arm, but that shit was sticking STRAIGHT out (IMG:style_emoticons/default/no2.gif) Manny was the one holding Bradley's arm and confiding to the ref (like he always does). |
|
|
Jun 18 2012, 07:04 PM
Post
#33
|
|
|
Light Heavyweight Group: Members Posts: 4,139 Joined: 20-May 11 From: killa kali Member No.: 12,336 |
Tell me about it! I dont how in the hell Bradley was "clamping" Pacquiao's arm, but that shit was sticking STRAIGHT out (IMG:style_emoticons/default/no2.gif) Manny was the one holding Bradley's arm and confiding to the ref (like he always does). they edited that out of the replay!!! am i the only one that noticed this disturbing situation!? (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif) |
|
|
Jun 18 2012, 08:44 PM
Post
#34
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,126 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
|
|
|
Jun 18 2012, 09:22 PM
Post
#35
|
|
|
Junior Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,486 Joined: 28-December 11 Member No.: 13,419 |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 04:54 AM
Post
#36
|
|
|
Lightweight Group: Members Posts: 781 Joined: 14-July 11 Member No.: 12,788 |
For those who still think it was a robbery, and didn't see some of the shit I saw, check out this video
|
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 01:35 PM
Post
#37
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 499 Joined: 29-April 05 Member No.: 2,107 |
Was HBO biased? Yes.
Still doesnt change the fact that Manny was the aggressor, landed more punches than Bradley, landed the more effective shots, and was robbed. Bradley did NOTHING to deserve the win, unless of course you score high for moving back, ducking and dodging punches. |
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 01:43 PM
Post
#38
|
|
|
Light Heavyweight Group: Members Posts: 4,139 Joined: 20-May 11 From: killa kali Member No.: 12,336 |
Was HBO biased? Yes. Still doesnt change the fact that Manny was the aggressor, landed more punches than Bradley, landed the more effective shots, and was robbed. Bradley did NOTHING to deserve the win, unless of course you score high for moving back, ducking and dodging punches. i do score defense. i also score effective aggression.....not mindless aggression. pac landed the better shots in some of the rounds....but lampley/lederman/compubox were giving him credit for missed shots. |
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 04:07 PM
Post
#39
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,126 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
i do score defense. i also score effective aggression.....not mindless aggression. pac landed the better shots in some of the rounds....but lampley/lederman/compubox were giving him credit for missed shots. That's a fair point to be honest, they were both missing a lot of punches due to the others defence, but HBO did call a lot of shots wrong. On an unrelated note Bradley had his head so low at periods of the fight I wouldn't of been surprised if he ended up with carpet Burns |
|
|
Jun 20 2012, 04:15 PM
Post
#40
|
|
|
Lightweight Group: Members Posts: 781 Joined: 14-July 11 Member No.: 12,788 |
Was HBO biased? Yes. Still doesnt change the fact that Manny was the aggressor, landed more punches than Bradley, landed the more effective shots, and was robbed. Bradley did NOTHING to deserve the win, unless of course you score high for moving back, ducking and dodging punches. lol at this. I don't score for the aggressor if they're not effective. Did you even watch the video? The point is most of Pacquiao's shit wasn't landing, and commentators and compubox were counting them, while ignoring most of the shit Bradley landed. The judges saw it better than what most people were foolish to believe. Thinking Pacquiao destroyed the kid, no such thing happened. Also, you're supposed to score defense, or did you forget? Clean punching, ring generalship, effective aggressiveness, and defense. People act like aggression is the only thing that matters. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd May 2013 - 06:09 AM |