![]() ![]() |
Jul 7 2012, 11:04 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,615 Joined: 21-July 11 Member No.: 12,858 |
Solid win for Donaire. Mathebula was game, he fought well
|
|
|
Jul 7 2012, 11:04 PM
Post
#42
|
|
|
"The Meanest Nice Guy" Group: Moderators Posts: 9,522 Joined: 11-May 11 From: Wherever Greatness is Bred Member No.: 12,050 |
What in the FUCK is up with these cards in favor of Donaire??? Sounds like Mathebula was just standing there taking punches with nothing in return. These judges I tell ya...
|
|
|
Jul 7 2012, 11:14 PM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,968 Joined: 18-August 11 From: California Grown Member No.: 13,079 |
They got the right guy winning but those scorecards were disrespectful. It was a very good close fight
|
|
|
Jul 8 2012, 03:29 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Super Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 3,181 Joined: 9-December 04 From: Atlanta Member No.: 1,309 |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2012, 04:11 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,615 Joined: 21-July 11 Member No.: 12,858 |
They may have seen each round as close as you and I. Each close round could still have gone to Donaire. Flaws in scoring for this sport. You are absolutely correct. I was reading the ring mag and they had an article in there about that horrendous decision against RJJ back in 88. You can fasr forward to today and in the amateurs, the scoring is even worse then it is in the pros (arguably). The set criteria that fights are supposed to be judged on are clearly NOT being used. Those scorecards in thsi fight had the right boxer winning but the margin of victory for Donaire left me bewildered. There needs to be some kind of accountability that these judges can be held too |
|
|
Jul 11 2012, 12:21 PM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Lightweight Group: Members Posts: 781 Joined: 14-July 11 Member No.: 12,788 |
Donaire barely won. I wanna see Donaire vs Rigondeaux.... No excuses.
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st May 2013 - 10:13 PM |