IPB  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
> OSDT, urine vs blood
mgrover
post Dec 30 2012, 10:35 AM
Post #1


Super Middleweight


Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,389
Joined: 23-May 11
Member No.: 12,366



I understand that both can be used in-conjunction with each other but has blood testing detected more than urine has? Since when the blood tested positive for Berto, Tarver, Peterson and Morales all there piss came back positive too. Blood been proven to be more effective?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
bnoles4life
post Dec 31 2012, 05:41 PM
Post #2


Welterweight


Group: Members
Posts: 1,575
Joined: 5-October 11
From: Dayton, OH
Member No.: 13,299



QUOTE (mgrover @ Dec 30 2012, 10:35 AM) *
I understand that both can be used in-conjunction with each other but has blood testing detected more than urine has? Since when the blood tested positive for Berto, Tarver, Peterson and Morales all there piss came back positive too. Blood been proven to be more effective?


Well, that depends. There are different things, both blood and urine, can be directed to detect. I'm curious to know exactly what they were testing for and for what those guys popped positive. Moreover, did the blood pop positive first? If so, they could have specifically tested for those drugs w/n the urine sample. In short, it's very possible the urine could've caught them, but I'm thinking the blood came back positive first.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th July 2014 - 02:36 AM