Dec 30 2012, 10:35 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Junior Middleweight Group: Members Posts: 2,224 Joined: 23-May 11 Member No.: 12,366 |
I understand that both can be used in-conjunction with each other but has blood testing detected more than urine has? Since when the blood tested positive for Berto, Tarver, Peterson and Morales all there piss came back positive too. Blood been proven to be more effective?
|
|
|
![]() |
Dec 31 2012, 05:41 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Junior Welterweight Group: Members Posts: 1,177 Joined: 5-October 11 From: Dayton, OH Member No.: 13,299 |
I understand that both can be used in-conjunction with each other but has blood testing detected more than urine has? Since when the blood tested positive for Berto, Tarver, Peterson and Morales all there piss came back positive too. Blood been proven to be more effective? Well, that depends. There are different things, both blood and urine, can be directed to detect. I'm curious to know exactly what they were testing for and for what those guys popped positive. Moreover, did the blood pop positive first? If so, they could have specifically tested for those drugs w/n the urine sample. In short, it's very possible the urine could've caught them, but I'm thinking the blood came back positive first. |
|
|
mgrover OSDT Dec 30 2012, 10:35 AM
daprofessor i've had these conversations way more than i w... Jan 1 2013, 03:54 AM
Cshel86 QUOTE (daprofessor @ Jan 1 2013, 03:54 AM... Jan 1 2013, 07:26 PM
bnoles4life QUOTE (daprofessor @ Jan 1 2013, 03:54 AM... Jan 1 2013, 09:57 PM
daprofessor QUOTE (bnoles4life @ Jan 1 2013, 10:57 PM... Jan 1 2013, 10:22 PM
mgrover I just like to be better informed so when I do mak... Jan 2 2013, 12:14 PM
Franchize From what I've been told and researched, not a... Jan 2 2013, 01:02 PM
daprofessor QUOTE (Franchize @ Jan 2 2013, 02:02 PM) ... Jan 2 2013, 03:46 PM
Cheesey1 QUOTE (daprofessor @ Jan 2 2013, 03:46 PM... Jan 6 2013, 08:55 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 05:12 PM |