Dec 30 2012, 04:20 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 12-July 11 Member No.: 12,770 |
Would Foreman have beaten Ali in a rematch had it taken place in 74' or within a couple years after?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My opinion is, Yes he absolutely would have! Ali is thee luckiest boxer on this planet when it came to his career (imho). One such example is the outcome of the rumble in the jungle. If fate exists, it appeared to be on the side of Ali in that first fight. Had a rematch happened, Foreman would've battered Ali and maybe put him on the canvas too on way to a decision win. What does everyone else think? |
|
|
![]() |
Dec 30 2012, 10:04 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Lightweight Group: Members Posts: 840 Joined: 1-January 08 From: Maryland Member No.: 6,594 |
Its hard to speculate about "what could have been" in this sport,.
Also "luck" isnt something that happens very often You are given 12 rounds to get the job done, (in those days 15)... Ali's win over foreman was an example of his ring intelligence and athleticism... did foreman crack, hell yea,.. but its hard to say how a rematch would have played.. |
|
|
Dec 31 2012, 08:07 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 12-July 11 Member No.: 12,770 |
probably but in the mans defence at that point in his career he wasn't the same fighter, thats why i see it such a big victory because he didn't quite have his legs to help him and he still came out the victor I agree completely. this thread is not intended to diminish ali in anyway. Its hard to speculate about "what could have been" in this sport,. Also "luck" isnt something that happens very often You are given 12 rounds to get the job done, (in those days 15)... Ali's win over foreman was an example of his ring intelligence and athleticism... did foreman crack, hell yea,.. but its hard to say how a rematch would have played.. Speculation in 'this sport' is cake but alright. you don't like my word choice of luck - may i substitute it with fortunate? Ali was fortunate that Foreman played into his strategy so well. Not everyone would have. On another night Foreman would not have, in a rematch he sure as hell would not have. Also, I would say the rumble in the jungle is indicative of when Ali won fights based on his popularity and sheer tenacity and less and less by ring intelligence or athleticism. It is hard to say how a rematch would have played, but condescending to state that in a thread begging the very question. |
|
|
wolterb Ali V Foreman II Dec 30 2012, 04:20 PM
mgrover probably but in the mans defence at that point in ... Dec 30 2012, 04:41 PM
Franchize I respect your opinion but I strongly disagree. Fi... Dec 31 2012, 09:02 AM
neophyte7 Speculation in 'this sport' is cake but al... Dec 31 2012, 01:14 PM
daprofessor ali definitely benefitted from foreman being cut i... Jan 1 2013, 04:11 AM
neophyte7 QUOTE (daprofessor @ Jan 1 2013, 04:11 AM... Jan 5 2013, 10:18 PM
daprofessor QUOTE (neophyte7 @ Jan 5 2013, 11:18 PM) ... Jan 6 2013, 05:12 PM
wolterb QUOTE (daprofessor @ Jan 1 2013, 04:11 AM... Jan 8 2013, 05:13 PM
daprofessor QUOTE (wolterb @ Jan 8 2013, 05:13 PM) I ... Jan 8 2013, 06:04 PM
neophyte7 Ali had nothing to prove after Foreman... should h... Jan 7 2013, 03:28 PM
daprofessor QUOTE (neophyte7 @ Jan 7 2013, 03:28 PM) ... Jan 7 2013, 07:31 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 12:00 PM |