Jan 18 2013, 09:04 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 435 Joined: 19-October 11 From: Brooklyn, New York Member No.: 13,329 |
Pretty Interesting question that I'd like to here some points on. I was chatting with a friend and he asked why Deontay Wilder's name can't generate the same kind of Buzz that Iron Mike generated when comparing the two's first 26 opponents. My answer was simply, well, one has a Gold medal and the other a Bronze. He came back saying well on a Professional level "one looks like Gold (Wilder) and the other Bronze (Tyson)" which is true (I guess), I mean both guys opposition were either over-matched or both these 2 guys skill level made it look so, Yet (on paper) Wilder has the better Win-K.O. ratio.
How can you compare this argument? |
|
|
![]() |
Jan 19 2013, 08:13 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Super Bantamweight Group: Members Posts: 453 Joined: 12-July 11 Member No.: 12,770 |
^totally agree.
i would bet wilder could become special though. i don't know anything of his character, but he has the athleticism and physique to compete in the heavyweight division if trained right. he won't gather the attention tyson did by beating on bums though for the reasons already stated. no one knows his potential until he steps it up even a smidge though. |
|
|
Gambit808 Deontay Wilder vs. Mike Tyson's first 26 Opponents. Jan 18 2013, 09:04 PM
mitukczuk Wilder doesn't have that beast aura around him... Jan 19 2013, 08:14 AM
daprofessor mike was a little dude knocking out big dudes in v... Jan 19 2013, 06:31 PM
daprofessor QUOTE (wolterb @ Jan 19 2013, 08:13 PM) ^... Jan 21 2013, 02:15 PM
wolterb ^ lol yeah his opponents are doa so far and i thin... Jan 21 2013, 07:52 PM![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 09:52 AM |