Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Has Boxing Progressed or Declined?, The Year 2003 vs 2013
Has Boxing Progressed or Declined?
The Year 2003 vs 2013
Progressed Since [ 5 ] ** [71.43%]
Declined Since [ 2 ] ** [28.57%]
Total Votes: 7
Guests cannot vote 
post Jan 30 2013, 07:54 PM
Post #1

Junior Welterweight

Group: Members
Posts: 1,154
Joined: 19-October 11
From: Brooklyn, New York
Member No.: 13,329

When u compare the landscape of boxing, from this point in time of stars/potential stars, compared to 2003 roster from each division, would you say (talent-wise) boxing has progressed or declined?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Start new topic
post Jan 31 2013, 02:55 AM
Post #2

Super Middleweight

Group: Moderators
Posts: 3,420
Joined: 23-May 11
Member No.: 12,366

I personally think its declined mainly because pre this era of boxing you had fighters that could box. The fundamentals weren't as big a joke they are today and even if the brawlers were in there they weren't just punchers with padded out records protected by there promoters. They could actually apply pressure, had head movement etc etc

This post has been edited by mgrover: Jan 31 2013, 02:56 AM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st August 2014 - 12:01 PM