IPB  

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
> Skilled Boxing Verses "Running", How Do The Fighers Influence The Perception of These Terms?
Jack 1000
post Apr 14 2013, 06:49 PM
Post #1


The Consultant


Group: Root Admin
Posts: 9,444
Joined: 2-December 02
Member No.: 14



In my view,

I think that today's generation is so accustomed to the brawling, slugging mentality, that we are seeing a trend of masterful boxers being booed and accused of running. I personally think that a masterful boxing is one who can employ the strategy of hit and not be hit. Jab, stick and move show the ability to dodge punches. A boxer defined as a "runner" refuses to engage, goes into a track meet, and does not try to win.

However, masterful boxers of the past like Pep, Ali, Leonard, Nelson, Whitaker were never accused of running, even though sometimes that had to run a little bit as part of the master boxing plan. However, because Ali and Leonard were master showmen, who were often loved, sometimes hated, with often no middle-ground, they could be forgiven for anything they did because of who they were.

Boxers like Mayweather and Hopkins are often criticized not only because of their personality, but because they don't brawl. Would today's generation of most fans and writers of boxing find Pep, Ali, and Leonard "boring?" Has boxing gotten to the point where so many fighters who don't brawl are considered "runners?"

Could elusive boxing be influencing judges in a negative way, where judges are thinking "effective aggressiveness has to involve brawling?" If a boxer is not coming forward, they think he should be punished for that? Is ineffective aggression being overly praised where the boxer is coming forward and throwing, but punches aren't landing?

Jack

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
neophyte7
post Apr 14 2013, 07:16 PM
Post #2


Welterweight


Group: Banned
Posts: 1,729
Joined: 21-April 07
From: New York, New York
Member No.: 5,991



Today's boxing public mirrors the dumbing down of society.. even boxing has suffered. Mike Tyson in this modern time is still in people's heads. Hopkins and Mayweather are testimony to the rewards of being a boxer. a boxer=civilized brawling= savagery... Rigondeaux reinforced the dictum that the civilized will always rule the uncivilzed savage
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 15th April 2014 - 11:48 PM