They already have a betting line for Mayweather-Pacquiao for "March 1st 2010"
Mayweather at $1.40
Pacquiao at $2.75
http://www.sportingbet.com.au/uipub/sport....mp;l2id=1333988
when its all said and done floyd will be favored. theres not that many stupid enough to bet on pacquiao.
Floyd is already a solid favourite according to these lines given.
Have they got odds for this fight never happening? I'd bet the house this fight never get signed
QUOTE (leonthegee @ Sep 27 2009, 01:56 AM) 
when its all said and done floyd will be favored. theres not that many stupid enough to bet on pacquiao.
Those oddsmakers are haters for not making Floyd a big enough favorite.
QUOTE (JD @ Sep 27 2009, 01:39 PM)
Those oddsmakers are haters for not making Floyd a big enough favorite.
And they must be sippin' on that haterade.
QUOTE (Fitz @ Sep 26 2009, 11:31 PM)
They already have a betting line for Mayweather-Pacquiao for "March 1st 2010"
Mayweather at $1.40
Pacquiao at $2.75
http://www.sportingbet.com.au/uipub/sport....mp;l2id=1333988
Mayweather at $1.40
Pacquiao at $2.75
http://www.sportingbet.com.au/uipub/sport....mp;l2id=1333988
Does this mean that if you bet a $1.00 on FLoyd you win $1.40?
How would this line look if it was a "+100 ,-100" type line you would find in vegas?
QUOTE (jp @ Sep 29 2009, 02:49 AM)
Does this mean that if you bet a $1.00 on FLoyd you win $1.40?
How would this line look if it was a "+100 ,-100" type line you would find in vegas?
How would this line look if it was a "+100 ,-100" type line you would find in vegas?
Yes, that's how it works. I'm not sure how it would look with +100 and -100 lines you guys use. It has been explained to me before, but I never understand it, lol.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.