QUOTE (TheFonz @ Apr 19 2011, 07:24 AM)

I clearly remember telling you how much Berto sucked months ago and where on here when you where trying build this guy up like was ever going be anything more than he showed last night. (Fact)
What part of this nearly unintelligible sentence includes a fact?
The only proven fact I can detect here is that you are relying on an ignorant person's memory to recall an ignorant person's
opinion of Berto "months ago."
Out of that sentence I can deduct that your
opinion was (and continues to be) that "Berto sucked." Your
opinion is that Saturday night's fight proves your
opinion.
In my
opinion Berto does not suck. In my
opinion Saturday night's fight backs up my
opinion that Berto does not suck.
QUOTE
The point is that you eye for boxing talent is as good as Berto's fighting talent. It was clear that since the Collazo fight Berto was trash yet you where his cheerleader on this site, great job (notsosmarty).
More personal
opinion and pre/immature leaps to conclusions about another's
opinions.
QUOTE
Now the fact that you don't rate Cotto at 147 really doesn't surprise me since you're the same guy that thought Berto was good fighter(Fact),
There you go tossing around that four letter word again, as if you actually know what it means or could identify one if it dropped out from between your legs.
You are of the
opinion that I do not rate Cotto at 147. You have zero proof to back up your
opinion so you skip that part and just claim that your
opinion is that four letter word.
Berto still is a good fighter, in my
opinion.
QUOTE
1. Cotto is small Jr Middle (Fact)
There you go again, expressing an
opinion that you don't bother to back up with evidence and claiming it is a
fact. I have never suggested that I disagree with you, though I have expressed the
opinion that I am not sure if Cotto can comfortably make 147 at this time.
QUOTE
the only reason he is up there is because that was the best option for him to get money fights after the Pac loss. It is pretty safe to say that had he beaten Pacquiao that he would have not made the move the move to 154.
2. As bad as Cotto looked against Clottey, I am 10000000% that Berto would have been KOed by him or lost a lopsided to decision to Clottey and I would favor Clottey over Ortiz also.
More naked
opinion.
QUOTE
3. Cotto fought Pacquiao and despite having no gameplan, no trainer, and loads of bad habits still gave Pac great fight for the first four rounds of the fight. <-Fact
Sorry Fonzy, whether or not I agree with your
opinion of the first four rounds of Pac v Cotto does not change the
fact that it is just your
opinion.
In fact, I could deduce from your
opinion that you think Cotto sucked up to and including the Pac fight. Is that true?
QUOTE
4. Cotto has looked much better since bringing Stewart. The fact that he hasn't been cut at all in any of the fights with stewart in the corner is a big indicator of the difference that manny has made in his fights. I will blame your bad eye for intricacies in the sweet science if you can't see the difference in Cotto's fight game with and without Manny Stewart in his corner. <-Fact
While I cannot dispute your claim that Cotto "hasn't been cut at all in any of the fights with stewart (sic) in the corner" without going back to review both fights completely, why would I? I never made the claim that
Steward has had no positive effect on "Cotto's fight game." In
fact my
opinion is the opposite.
QUOTE
Cotto Jab would give Ortiz fits and he would just beat the living shit out Berto.
More naked
opinion.
The one (and only)
fact that you have substantiated in the above rerun is the
fact that you have no fucking clue what is
fact and what is
opinion.
Sad but true.