QUOTE (TheFonz @ Apr 19 2011, 07:24 AM)
I clearly remember telling you how much Berto sucked months ago and where on here when you where trying build this guy up like was ever going be anything more than he showed last night. (Fact)
What part of this nearly unintelligible sentence includes a fact?
The only proven fact I can detect here is that you are relying on an ignorant person's memory to recall an ignorant person's opinion
of Berto "months ago."
Out of that sentence I can deduct that your opinion
was (and continues to be) that "Berto sucked." Your opinion
is that Saturday night's fight proves your opinion
In my opinion
Berto does not suck. In my opinion
Saturday night's fight backs up my opinion
that Berto does not suck.
The point is that you eye for boxing talent is as good as Berto's fighting talent. It was clear that since the Collazo fight Berto was trash yet you where his cheerleader on this site, great job (notsosmarty).
More personal opinion
and pre/immature leaps to conclusions about another's opinions
Now the fact that you don't rate Cotto at 147 really doesn't surprise me since you're the same guy that thought Berto was good fighter(Fact),
There you go tossing around that four letter word again, as if you actually know what it means or could identify one if it dropped out from between your legs.
You are of the opinion
that I do not rate Cotto at 147. You have zero proof to back up your opinion
so you skip that part and just claim that your opinion
is that four letter word.
Berto still is a good fighter, in my opinion
1. Cotto is small Jr Middle (Fact)
There you go again, expressing an opinion
that you don't bother to back up with evidence and claiming it is a fact
. I have never suggested that I disagree with you, though I have expressed the opinion
that I am not sure if Cotto can comfortably make 147 at this time.
the only reason he is up there is because that was the best option for him to get money fights after the Pac loss. It is pretty safe to say that had he beaten Pacquiao that he would have not made the move the move to 154.
2. As bad as Cotto looked against Clottey, I am 10000000% that Berto would have been KOed by him or lost a lopsided to decision to Clottey and I would favor Clottey over Ortiz also.
More naked opinion
3. Cotto fought Pacquiao and despite having no gameplan, no trainer, and loads of bad habits still gave Pac great fight for the first four rounds of the fight. <-Fact
Sorry Fonzy, whether or not I agree with your opinion
of the first four rounds of Pac v Cotto does not change the fact
that it is just your opinion
In fact, I could deduce from your opinion
that you think Cotto sucked up to and including the Pac fight. Is that true?
4. Cotto has looked much better since bringing Stewart. The fact that he hasn't been cut at all in any of the fights with stewart in the corner is a big indicator of the difference that manny has made in his fights. I will blame your bad eye for intricacies in the sweet science if you can't see the difference in Cotto's fight game with and without Manny Stewart in his corner. <-Fact
While I cannot dispute your claim that Cotto "hasn't been cut at all in any of the fights with stewart (sic) in the corner" without going back to review both fights completely, why would I? I never made the claim that Steward
has had no positive effect on "Cotto's fight game." In fact
is the opposite.
Cotto Jab would give Ortiz fits and he would just beat the living shit out Berto.
More naked opinion
The one (and only) fact
that you have substantiated in the above rerun is the fact
that you have no fucking clue what is fact
and what is opinion
Sad but true.