QUOTE (FightHypeRules @ Jul 8 2011, 10:51 PM)

I think that there have been instances, particularly in Interviews with Floyd (and Toney as well) where you guys CLEARLY come down on their side. And it's basically just in how the questions and comments towards the fighters are. Where you seemingly come into it already agreeing.
Questions like (just paraphrasing here, this isn't a direct question I'm attributing to you), "I already know this is a dumb question but you know, some of these people are going by blogs and whatnot"
I think that it is easy to see how some people may view those types of things as less of an interview and more of a press release.
You'll have to give me a better example than that because the only time I've said something remotely close to "I already know this is a dumb question" was when some IDIOT "blogger" from another site wrote an article titled "13 Questions that Ben Thompson should ask Floyd Mayweather". That wasn't even an interview I was doing with Floyd and truth be told, a lot of those questions WERE dumb...and a lot of those questions he already answered. I mean, one of the questions was, "Floyd, you said God would never let you lose. If that's the case, why not just fight Manny without asking for the tests." I'm sorry, but that's a DUMB question. That's the ONLY time I said anything remotely close to that. Any other time, whoever I'm talking to, I let them say what they have to say and keep it moving. My interviews with Floyd are no different than my interviews with Michael Koncz or Andre Ward or WHOEVER. Likewise, Percy's interviews with James Toney are no different than his interviews with Pacquiao, Mayweather Sr. or WHOEVER.
QUOTE (FightHypeRules @ Jul 8 2011, 10:51 PM)

I'm not saying go ham on the guy and start pressing them and backing them into a corner. I just think that sometimes it seems you are taking sides when putting questions to the interview subject. And that well may be, and as I've said before, I don't necessarily have a problem with that.
It's just that some people try to make it out like this site is 100% down the middle, and it's those OTHER 99.9% of the sites out there that are all biased in favor of Manny or Floyd or some other fighter.
I don't think anyone can ever be 100% down the middle, but how am I "taking sides" when I'm talking to people in BOTH camps. I don't know of ANYONE ELSE who is talking to BOTH camps. I know a lot of people talking to Bob Arum and Michael Koncz, but I don't know of too many people talking to Al Haymon, Leonard Ellerbe, or Floyd Mayweather other than me. So how is it that one of the few guys talking to BOTH camps is biased, but everyone else talking to only one camp is unbiased? I don't get that one. If anything, I would think that we're LESS biased than everyone else because we're actually trying to get the story from BOTH sides.
QUOTE (FightHypeRules @ Jul 8 2011, 10:51 PM)

I don't think it's a bad thing, and I'm not saying you are a fan of one guy and not a fan of the other guy. I know you've said you like both fighters, but some of your posts have clearly shown that you are on Floyd's side in the ODST stuff.
Again. Not a problem.
It's got nothing to do with being on "Floyd's side" and EVERYTHING TO DO with believing that drug testing procedures in both boxing and mixed martial arts are EXTREMELY FLAWED and need to be fixed. Do I agree with Floyd that the sport needs to be cleaned up? Absolutely! When guys only fight 1 or 2 times a year and they know WELL IN ADVANCE when they're fighting, it makes it EXTREMELY EASY to cycle on and off any number of PEDs. Personally, I think testing should be year-round. I mean, how can you NOT share Floyd's opinion on better testing procedures in the sport? I'm TRULY LOST at how anyone can complain about something that is GOOD for the sport.
QUOTE (FightHypeRules @ Jul 8 2011, 10:51 PM)

And while you have said that Manny is within his right to not take the tests, you also continue to cast aspersions on WHY he's not taking the test, mocking the various excuses that have been given. Now that's perfectly rational to do so, because as I've said in this thread the Top Rank people can't get their shit together and keep giving contradictory statements. But that's throwing your opinion in, and thus is not a non-biased opinion.
Once again. Not a problem. Just not non-biased. I don't think being biased is a huge stigma that a lot of people seem to think it is, but I also think that it is there. That being my opinion.
That's not true at all. When have I ever mocked one of Pacquiao's excuses? If he's afraid of giving blood because he thinks it weakens him...fine...then he's afraid of giving blood. If he's afraid of needles...fine...then he's afraid of needles. If he doesn't want to give in to Floyd's demands because he doesn't want him to have a mental edge...hey....I'm fine with that too. Whatever reason Manny Pacquiao has for not wanting to take the tests, he's entitled to that. What I absolutely DO take exception to are all the excuses BOB ARUM gives and the manner in which he gives them. It's always Bob Arum coming up with excuse after excuse after excuse. The ONLY person that I am "casting aspersions on" is Bob Arum, therefore, what I do is explain the reasons why BOB ARUM would prefer not to make the fight. I'm pretty sure I've made it CRYSTAL CLEAR that I think Bob Arum, not Floyd or Manny, is the reason why this fight isn't happening. When it comes to boxing, Manny's a follower...not a leader...and he follows whatever Bob Arum tells him to do.
QUOTE (FightHypeRules @ Jul 8 2011, 10:51 PM)

I think (and I'm not trying to draw a direct conparison here) it's along the lines of how some critics of Fox News. It's not that they are CLEARLY on the side of the Republicans and try to sabotage any Democrat that comes on their shows, it's that they do so and pretend that they aren't. Pretend that they're completly fair and balanced. I know many who don't give a shit if they're a mouth piece for the Republicans, it's that they are misrepresenting themselves.
And while I would never draw a comparison between this site and that network for obvious reasons, I would say that it's along that line of it being perfectly reasonable to have an opinion on things. I just think that those who try to say this site is 100% down the middle, is misguided. And perhaps that's what some people take issue with. Can't speak for everyone though.
Fox News, TMZ, National Enquirer....I could care less what critics compare us to...just as long as they continue to read us, take quotes from us, write stories based off of interviews from us....all of that puts a smile on my face. So if people want to call us FloydHype.com...hey...I love it...that's a compliment to be associated with one of the biggest names in the sport. I'd much rather be known as FloydHype.com than RossThompsonHype.com. LOL.